Are Exynos processors bad?
Exynos continues to be inferior, and people are not happy Samsung’s shareholders aren’t happy, either: The company was grilled at its annual shareholder meeting recently for reasons why it continues to sell its phones with Exynos chipsets despite the poorer performance compared to Snapdragon SoCs..
Why Exynos is not used by Samsung in the US market?
Because the Exynos chipset, while good on CPU/GPU benchmarking, is still quite weak in radio performance compared to Qualcomm. … CDMA is not supported by the Exynos modem, so Samsung likely decided to use only one HW-chassis for the whole region and chose Qualcomm for whole US-market.
Which is better Exynos 9611 or Snapdragon?
Exynos 9611 processor supports dual camera setup with a 16MP + 16MP or a single 64MP camera support while the Snapdragon 712 supports a 192MP single camera or a dual 16MP +16MP setup, which gives the Snapdragon 712 an advantage over the Exynos 9611 in terms of better single-camera setup.
Is exynos better than Snapdragon?
The difference is in the number of cores: Samsung’s in-house SoC uses an octa-core 64-bit chip whereas the Snapdragon is a quad-core chip. In terms of clocking skills, the Exynos cores are clocked at a lower speed when compared to that of Snapdragon.
Is exynos 990 really bad?
Exynos 990 isn’t really that bad because it is comparatively less efficient and powerful compared to its rival in the Snapdragon which is far more powerful and far more battery efficient to be honest. The Snapdragon 865 also offered better graphics than the Exynos 990 and this also factored heavily into the decision.
Is exynos worse than Snapdragon?
Starting off with the CPU-focused Geekbench benchmark, the Cortex A77 core in the Snapdragon variant pulls ahead ever so slightly with a score of 811.4 points versus the 764 points scored by the Exynos version. … Interestingly, the Exynos 990’s Mali G77 GPU performed significantly worse than we’d have expected.